<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
> <channel><title>SEO and Webmastering 24h reports &#187; Google</title> <atom:link href="http://www.swr24.com/category/google/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.swr24.com</link> <description>Search Engine Optimization and Webmastering 24h reports written by Lana Galileo</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:23:31 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator> <item><title>Google+ is a New Facebook</title><link>http://www.swr24.com/google-new-facebook</link> <comments>http://www.swr24.com/google-new-facebook#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 06:01:03 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Lana Galileo</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Google]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.swr24.com/?p=899</guid> <description><![CDATA[<a
href="http://www.swr24.com/google-new-facebook"><img
align="left" hspace="5" width="150" src="http://www.swr24.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/google-vs-facebook-250x222.png" class="alignleft wp-post-image tfe" alt="" title="google-vs-facebook" /></a><p>Just remember in the past in Feb . of the year 2010, once Google launched a social media program known as Google Buzz, and all sorts of the blog writers marveled that Google has been so strongly taking up Facebook? Clearly, that did not workout so nicely. Today Google is truly taking on Facebook, and not only just in the half hearten type of way.</p><p>See the introduction of Google+, a complete listed social network which seeks to &#8220;bring the nuance and wealth of true life revealing to application.&#8221; <a
rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="https://plus.google.com/up/start/?sw=1&#38;type=st" target="_blank">Google+</a> is not very much a social network, as we are familiar with the word, but an accumulation of services which have sociable elements for them. A person has a number of buddies, however its much more created for little groups of your true life buddies as opposed to a huge contacts list, with which you share every thing constantly. Rather, it will help you find content, share it with all the friends you believe might enjoy it, and contacting them on an personal or even little group basis. At first glance, however, it does not seem all that different from Facebook or perhaps Twitter. There is&#8230; <a
href="http://www.swr24.com/google-new-facebook" class="read_more">Read the rest</a></p>]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.swr24.com/google-new-facebook/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Secret +1 Google Button Finally Out</title><link>http://www.swr24.com/secret-1-google-button-finally</link> <comments>http://www.swr24.com/secret-1-google-button-finally#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 08:52:03 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Lana Galileo</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Google]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.swr24.com/?p=892</guid> <description><![CDATA[<a
href="http://www.swr24.com/secret-1-google-button-finally"><img
align="left" hspace="5" width="150" src="http://www.swr24.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/google-1-button-250x187.jpg" class="alignleft wp-post-image tfe" alt="" title="google-1-button" /></a><p>The <a
rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="https://services.google.com/fb/forms/plusonesignup/" target="_blank">+1 button</a> is Google&#8217;s reply to Facebook&#8217;s productive &#8220;Like&#8221; function, in which people may simply click a symbol to make thankfulness for a website. From when they were launched a year ago, Facebook&#8217;s Like Buttons have got put their hands up on nearly every web site, which makes it simple for visitors to share internet sites and services with a single click. A primary reason Facebook’s “like” button is indeed popular is simply because web publishers all around the web publish it on all their content material. It will help generate engagement between visitors, and possible traffic as people share that content with their own buddies. If websites choose the +1 button, it makes you wonder exactly how many will keep on to make use of the Buzz button at the same time. Both buttons will publish content to the user’s profile web page. One will possess the benefit of contributing to search engine rankings. Content websites are becoming cluttered with social buttons like it is. How many will use both Google buttons? As an example, how many existing Buzz users may use both solutions? Is it the start of the end for Google Buzz?&#8230; <a
href="http://www.swr24.com/secret-1-google-button-finally" class="read_more">Read the rest</a></p>]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.swr24.com/secret-1-google-button-finally/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Google Chrome Against Content Farms</title><link>http://www.swr24.com/google-chrome-against-content-farms</link> <comments>http://www.swr24.com/google-chrome-against-content-farms#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 18:38:42 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Lana Galileo</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Google]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.swr24.com/?p=840</guid> <description><![CDATA[<a
href="http://www.swr24.com/google-chrome-against-content-farms"><img
align="left" hspace="5" width="150" src="http://www.leeroo.com/images/746_google_chrome.jpg" class="alignleft wp-post-image tfe" alt="Google Chrome" title="Google Chrome" /></a><p>Google on Monday gave users of its Chrome Net browser the ability to dam search outcomes from low-high quality websites often called content material farms.</p><p>Chrome users can now obtain an extension from Google referred to as Private Blocklist that may enable users to dam certain domains from appearing in a personalized checklist of search results. Google can even observe the domains that users flag &#8220;and discover using it as a possible rating signal for our search outcomes,&#8221; wrote Matt Cutts, principal engineer at Google and a distinguished anti-spam spokesman for the corporate, in a weblog post.</p><p>“If put in, the extension additionally sends blocked website info to Google, and we will study the ensuing feedback and explore using it as a possible ranking sign for our search results.”<br
/> Cutts stated the <a
rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Chrome" target="_blank">Chrome </a>extension was out there in French, German, Italian, Portuguese, Russian, Spanish and Turkish along with English.</p> ]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.swr24.com/google-chrome-against-content-farms/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Whats Google Washing</title><link>http://www.swr24.com/whats-google-washing</link> <comments>http://www.swr24.com/whats-google-washing#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sat, 12 Feb 2011 09:03:58 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Lana Galileo</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Google]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.swr24.com/?p=837</guid> <description><![CDATA[<a
href="http://www.swr24.com/whats-google-washing"><img
align="left" hspace="5" width="150" src="http://www.leeroo.com/images/959_google_bomb.jpg" class="alignleft wp-post-image tfe" alt="Googl Bombing" title="Googl Bombing" /></a><p>Internet search big Google has been steadily increasing its presence in Washington as the corporate seeks to capture a larger share of the federal market for info expertise merchandise and services. Google officials discussed the corporate&#8217;s rising involvement within the authorities area on at an occasion on Tuesday.</p><p><strong>So what&#8217;s <a
rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_bomb" target="_blank">Google Bombing</a>?</strong><br
/> It is completed for either business, political, or comedic purposes (or a combination of the latter two). Google&#8217;s search-rank algorithm ranks pages increased for a particular search phrase if enough different pages linked to it utilizing comparable anchor text (linking text akin to &#8220;miserable failure&#8221;). Nevertheless, by January 2007 Google had made changes to search results to counter fashionable Google bombs, equivalent to &#8220;miserable failure&#8221;, which now lists pages in regards to the Google bomb itself. Google bombing is carefully related to spamdexing, the follow of deliberately modifying HTML pages to increase the possibility of their website being positioned close to the start of search engine outcomes, or to influence the category to which the page is assigned in a deceptive or dishonest manner.</p> ]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.swr24.com/whats-google-washing/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Google Accuse Bing For Stealing</title><link>http://www.swr24.com/google-accuse-bing-stealing</link> <comments>http://www.swr24.com/google-accuse-bing-stealing#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 13:25:05 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Lana Galileo</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Google]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.swr24.com/?p=827</guid> <description><![CDATA[<a
href="http://www.swr24.com/google-accuse-bing-stealing"><img
align="left" hspace="5" width="150" src="http://www.leeroo.com/images/960_bingLogo_5F00_lg.jpg" class="alignleft wp-post-image tfe" alt="bing" title="bing" /></a><p>Google has run a sting operation that it says proves Bing has been watching what folks search for on Google, the websites they select from Google’s results, then uses that data to improve Bing’s own search listings. Bing doesn’t deny this. For instance, Google created an artificial query linking the non-sensible phrase “hiybbprqag” to a result about seating in a theater in Los Angeles. After a while, the same end result appeared on Bing, Google claims that the one method this could have occurred is that if Bing simply copied the consequence from them, as the one connection between the query and the result was &#8211; Google. Microsoft’s reply, coming from an organization’s spokesperson, was clear but not very revealing: “<a
rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-12343597" target="_blank">We don&#8217;t copy Google’s results</a>.” Later at the moment, I’ll possible have a more detailed response from Bing. Microsoft wanted to talk further after a search event it is hosting today. More about that event, and how I came to be reporting on Google’s findings simply before it began, comes at the end of this story. But first, here’s how Google’s investigation unfolded.</p><p>Google has stressed that it has now removed the one-time code that it&#8230; <a
href="http://www.swr24.com/google-accuse-bing-stealing" class="read_more">Read the rest</a></p>]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.swr24.com/google-accuse-bing-stealing/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>People Switching To Yahoo</title><link>http://www.swr24.com/people-switching-yahoo</link> <comments>http://www.swr24.com/people-switching-yahoo#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 16:42:05 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Lana Galileo</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Google]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.swr24.com/?p=818</guid> <description><![CDATA[<a
href="http://www.swr24.com/people-switching-yahoo"><img
align="left" hspace="5" width="150" src="http://www.leeroo.com/images/277_google_verizon_android.jpg" class="alignleft wp-post-image tfe" alt="Google Verizon" title="Google Verizon" /></a><p>Google and Verizon, two main gamers in Web service and content, are nearing an agreement that could allow Verizon to hurry some on-line content to Internet users extra quickly if the content material’s creators are willing to pay for the privilege. Such an settlement could overthrow a once-sacred tenet of Internet coverage referred to as web neutrality, through which no type of content material is favored over another. In its place, consumers may soon see a brand new, tiered system, which, like cable tv, imposes larger costs for premium ranges of service.</p><p>Supply: <a
rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/05/technology/05secret.html?_r=3" target="_blank">NY Times</a><br
/> It&#8217;s possibly time to switch to yahoo.com. Why would regular clients help this? I m switching to yahoo.com. If you are switching to <a
rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.yahoo.com" target="_blank">yahoo.com</a> poast in comment box.</p> ]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.swr24.com/people-switching-yahoo/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
